Respiratory Therapy
Results of Assessment
2001-2002 (submitted
09/27/02)
The "Graduate Outcome Measures" grids
found below describe the desired outcomes, the methods of assessment of these
outcomes, the results of these assessments, and the plans based upon the outcome
measures. Grids are provided for both the A.A.S. and A.S. programs:
Advanced-Level
Respiratory Therapist Program (A.S.)
Entry-Level Respiratory Therapist Program (A.A.S.)
The kinds of data gathered for the department
outcomes assessment include graduate performance on national credentialing
examinations, graduate surveys, employer surveys, and faculty evaluations.
Reports of graduate performance on credentialing exams are updated frequently on
the National Board for Respiratory Care [N.B.R.C.] website and downloaded about
every three months for faculty review. Employer surveys are distributed within 6
months of graduation, returned surveys are distributed in faculty meetings for
faculty review and discussion. Graduate surveys are mailed to graduates within a
year of graduation (or distributed on campus for those students still enrolled);
graduate survey return rate is much lower than the employer survey return rate,
but returned surveys are distributed in faculty meeting for review. Faculty
meetings are routinely scheduled weekly throughout the academic year and are
rarely cancelled, meetings last an average of 90 minutes (many are longer).
Faculty meetings always begin with a review of
student progress or student issues. This discussion is often mirrored by student
comments (formally or informally) or employer feedback. A continuing issue for
the program faculty is the provision of consistent academic advising for all
students, particularly regarding progress towards degree completion. Another
concern among faculty and students is the concentrated academic load during the
A.A.S.-program (39 credits) with a disproportionately lighter load in the A.S.-program
(25 credits).
As a result of faculty and student feedback, all
students are now assigned a faculty advisor who is responsible to meet
individually with his/her students at least twice during each semester. This
advising session is focused on academic progress and degree completion, but it
may also include student referral to appropriate agencies or resources on
campus.
Regarding the academic load, the faculty have
been engaging in discussions over the past year in an effort to re-distribute
courses over 5 semesters rather than the current 4-semester configuration. This
model will be implemented in our off-campus programs effective January 2003; we
are still trying to determine how this model could be implemented on campus
without extending faculty contracts (our program currently does not offer summer
courses).
Employer and graduate feedback have also
recommended additional clinical practice in neonatal and pediatric care, as well
as having students complete clinical experiences during evening and night
shifts. These changes are being incorporated into clinical schedules during the
2002-03 academic year. It is of some note that although our students and their
employers seek such additional refinements, graduate performance on standardized
national examinations is consistently 40-50% better than the national mean.
All outcomes being assessed currently will
continue to be assessed during 2002-03 utilizing the same evaluation instruments
and methods.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Advanced-Level Respiratory Therapist Program (A.S.)
|
Outcome |
Assessment(s) |
Frequency/
calendar |
Outcome(s) |
Plan |
| Prepare
competent advanced-level respiratory therapists who meet the cognitive
(knowledge) expectations of employers. |
1. Performance on
standardized national credentialing examinations (R.R.T.: Clinical
Simulation and Written registry) |
1. Examinations
are administered via the Internet throughout the year (graduates are now
eligible within 2 weeks of graduation) |
1. 90% of WSU
graduates (18/20) passed Clinical Simulation (national pass-rate 58%); 93% WSU
graduates (13/14) passed written registry (72% national pass-rate). |
1. Continue to
modify curriculum as necessary to preserve acceptable pass-rate on
national examination. |
| 2. Employer
surveys
|
2. Employer
surveys are distributed within 9 months of program completion |
2. Employer survey
return rate is over 90%; employers report satisfaction with level of
knowledge of new graduates |
2. Continue to
utilize Employer surveys; actively seek additional feedback through
Advisory Committee. |
| Prepare
competent advanced -level respiratory therapists who meet the psychomotor
skills expectations of employers. |
3. Students must
return-demonstrate a random selection of previously learned skills |
3. This assessment
is done within 6 weeks of program completion
|
3. Students have
been successful in retaining skills
|
3. This system was
implemented at the suggestion of the Advisory committee and has been
very useful |
| 4. Employer
satisfaction surveys
|
4. Employer
surveys are distributed within 9 months of program completion |
4. Employers
report satisfaction with graduate skills and knowledge regarding
equipment-related job requirements |
4. Continue to
utilize and monitor |
| Prepare
competent advanced-level respiratory therapists who meet the affective
skills expectations of employers. |
5. Faculty
summative evaluations
|
5. Faculty
complete a summary assessment within 3 months of program completion |
5. Faculty are
generally satisfied with student behaviors. |
5. Continue to
mentor and help students develop appropriate professional behavioral
skills |
| 6. Employer
satisfaction surveys
|
6. Employer
surveys are distributed within 9 months of program completion |
6. Employers
report 90% satisfaction with work habits, communication skills, etc.
exhibited by new graduates |
6. Continue to
monitor
|
| Retain
90% of students selected to enter the program; place 90% of program
graduates within 6 months of program completion |
7. Program
retention records |
7. Annually |
7. Attrition 2001-02
(24 students) was 2 [8%]. |
7. Continue to
utilize selection system and faculty advising |
| 8. Program
placement records |
8. Annually |
8. 24/24 (100%)
graduates were employed in the field within 6 months of graduation |
8. Continue to
match graduate numbers with available jobs |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Entry-Level Respiratory Therapist Program (A.A.S.)
|
Outcome |
Assessment(s) |
Frequency/
calendar |
Outcome(s) |
Plan |
| Prepare
competent entry-level respiratory therapists who meet-the cognitive
(knowledge) expectations of employers. |
1.
Performance on standardized national credentialing examination (C.R.T.) |
1.
Examinations are administered via the Internet throughout the year
(graduates are now eligible within 2 weeks of graduation) |
1. 22/26 graduates passed the NBRC entry-level examination
(81% pass-rate);
national pass-rate for this examination was 49%. |
1.
Continue to modify curriculum as necessary to preserve acceptable
pass-rate on national examination. |
| 2.
Employer surveys
|
2.
Employer surveys are distributed within 9 months of program completion |
2.
Employer survey return rate is over 90%; employers report satisfaction
with level of knowledge of new graduates |
2.
Continue to utilize Employer surveys; actively seek additional feedback
through Advisory Committee. |
| Prepare
competent entry-level respiratory therapists who meet the psychomotor
skills expectations of employers. |
3.
Students must return-demonstrate a random selection of previously
learned skills |
3.
This assessment is done within 6 weeks of program completion
|
3.
Students have been successful in retaining skills
|
3.
This system was implemented at the suggestion of the Advisory committee
and has been very useful |
| 4.
Employer satisfaction surveys
|
4.
Employer surveys are distributed within 9 months of program completion |
4.
Employers report satisfaction with graduate skills and knowledge
regarding equipment-related job requirements |
4.
Continue to utilize and monitor
|
| Prepare
competent entry-level respiratory therapists who meet the affective
skills expectations of employers. |
5.
Faculty summative evaluations
|
5.
Faculty complete a summary assessment within 3 months of program
completion |
5.
Faculty are generally satisfied with student behaviors. |
5.
Continue to mentor and help students develop appropriate professional
behavioral skills |
| 6.
Employer satisfaction surveys
|
6.
Employer surveys are distributed within 9 months of program completion |
6.
Employers report 90% satisfaction with work habits, communication
skills, etc. exhibited by new graduates |
6.
Continue to monitor
|
| Retain
90% of students selected to enter the program; place 90% of program
graduates within 6 months of program completion
|
7.
Program retention records |
7.
Annually |
7.
Attrition 2001-02 (26 students) was 1 (4%). |
7.
Continue to utilize selection system and faculty advising |
| 8. Program
placement records
|
8. Annually
|
8. 24/26 (93%)
graduates were employed in the field within 6 months of graduation. |
8. Continue to
match graduate numbers with available jobs |
Mission Statement /
Student Learning Outcomes / Curriculum Grid / Assessment
Plan / Contact Person
|