|
Music
Results of Assessment
2001-2002 (submitted
09/30/02)
It should be noted that all thirty-four Learning
Outcomes in the Music Area are assessed each year in their various forms. Not
all assessment procedures are used with each of the outcome measurements:
|
1. Understand and be able to apply the basics of
music theory, aural, and keyboard proficiency.
Performance evaluation, written assignments
|
18. Have a working knowledge of instrumental and
vocal techniques appropriate for teaching.
Proficiency exam, video, graduate survey,
student teaching.
|
|
2. Have a working knowledge of the historical
basis of the development of musical forms and structures.
Written tests, written analysis, aural
analysis, written analysis, written tests.
|
19. Have a working knowledge of appropriate
instructional materials and their use.
Proficiency exam, video, graduate survey,
student teaching.
|
|
3. Have a knowledge and understanding of the
historical development of music, its historical periods, genres, mediums, and
composers, within their cultural context.
Written analysis, writing samples, aural
analysis, written tests.
|
20. Demonstrate skills in the administration of
the school music program.
Portfolio, graduate survey.
|
|
4. Be familiar with music technology in its
various forms for teaching, composition, and scholarly pursuits.
Participant observation, upper division
selected assignments.
|
21. Understand and be able use effective
classroom management skills.
Video, portfolio, student teaching.
|
|
5. Have a practical knowledge of performance
practice in their particular ensemble performing area(s).
Simulated activities, observations.
|
22. Have a knowledge of pedagogical methods and
materials in the appropriate discipline and the ability to evaluate the
appropriateness of those methods with respect to individual teaching situations.
Oral and /or written report portfolio,
internship, graduate survey.
|
|
6. Have a knowledge of solo repertoire and
technical studies in their major area of study.
Juries, recitals, other concert
performances, master classes.
|
23. Be able to apply appropriate pedagogical
knowledge and prepare effective lesson plans in a variety teaching situations.
Internship, videotape, graduate survey,
portfolio
|
|
7. Be able to work independently on a variety of
musical problems by combining their capabilities in performance, aural, verbal
and visual analysis, composition, repertoire knowledge, and music history.
Observations, graduate surveys, recital
paper or program notes.
|
24. Be able to establish and articulate a
philosophy of music teaching and learning.
Written assignments, portfolio, simulated
activity.
|
|
8. Have writing skills and ability to use
research tools (library, internet, etc.)
Papers, writing samples, participant
observation, simulated activities.
|
25. Demonstrate knowledge, experience and
teaching skills for further graduate study in pedagogy or a career in music
studio teaching.
Portfolio, internship, graduate survey.
|
|
9. Be able to demonstrate performing competence
in their major area of study.
Juries, recitals, master class
|
26. Demonstrate competency in evaluating various
music software and/or technologies as they relate to pedagogy.
Written assignments, oral reports, portfolio
|
|
10. Be able to articulate basic knowledge of
applicable performance and teaching literature.
Repertoire lists, master class
|
27. Demonstrate knowledge, skills, and rehearsal
techniques of piano accompanying in a variety of settings.
Performance evaluation, studio accompanying,
concert/convocation evaluation.
|
|
11. Have a working knowledge of music education
in the U.S. schools.
Written tests, MENC membership.
|
28. Demonstrate knowledge of literature styles
and performance practice in the student’s major performance area.
Recitals, juries, master class, graduate
survey, recital program notes/papers, written report.
|
|
12. Be able to articulate a philosophy of music
education.
Student teaching, portfolio.
|
29. Be able to demonstrate a high quality of
performance competence in the student’s major area of study.
Recitals , juries, master class.
|
|
13. Be familiar with standard music curricula,
particularly the National Standards for Music Education and the Utah Core
Curriculum.
Written tests, comparison papers
|
30. Have the skills necessary to prepare for
performance independent of outside teaching and assistance.
Recitals, juries, graduate surveys
|
|
14. Be able to write goals and objectives for
music instruction.
Portfolio, graduate surveys, student
teaching.
|
31. Be able to articulate knowledge of applicable
performance and teaching literature.
Portfolios, notebooks
|
|
15. Be able to prepare effective lesson plans for
class lessons and ensemble rehearsals.
Portfolio, video, student teaching, graduate
surveys.
|
32. Have a knowledge of the fundamentals of music
pedagogy.
Written assignments, observations.
|
|
16. Diagnose and prescribe appropriate content
and techniques according to the music learning sequence for all levels and types
of learners.
Video, written test, student teaching, field
experience, internship
|
33. Vocal majors will be able to sing in foreign
languages.
Juries, recitals, master class.
|
|
17. Have competent conducting technique and
rehearsal techniques for a variety of ensemble situations.
Video, graduate survey, written test, field
experience, internship.
|
34. Have a practical knowledge of performance
practice in their particular ensemble performing area(s).
Simulated activities, observations.
|
Additionally the Music Area outcomes assessment
results for 2001-2002 showed the following:
1. In the Music Core test results continue as an
accurate indicator of students’ ability in the courses. Students who
successfully complete the first two years of school, therefore completing the
core, are rarely unable to complete the remainder of their major courses.
2. As was noted in last year's assessment report,
a music theory placement test was administered to all students entering first
year theory. This test has successfully placed students into either the
Fundamentals of Music course, or in a few cases, allowed qualified students to
skip to the second semester of theory.
3. As a requirement for re-accreditation with the
National Association of Schools of Music, and to continue to build strength in
the music degree programs, incoming students were formally auditioned for
placement in their requested major areas for the first time. The majority were
successfully admitted, but a few were deferred and placed into the Music 1601
lessons for non-majors. These students were allowed to enroll in the academic
courses, and will be allowed to complete the first year of these courses, by
which time they must successfully audition for admittance or they will not be
allowed to continue. A number of these students re-auditioned at the beginning
of the second semester, and most were successful. As a result of these auditions
we will better be able to track the progress of these students who wish to
pursue a degree in music, but are not a the necessary performance level to do
so.
4. Students who complete their junior and senior
recitals are passing these recitals. A larger number of recitals were not
completed during the semester in which the students enrolled for them. As a
result the faculty determined that students who do not complete the recital will
receive a failing grade until the recital is completed.
5. Students in the Music Education program
continue to feel that the College of Education programs do not sufficiently meet
the need for the correct preparation to be music teachers. It is becoming more
obvious that education course work needs to be more specifically oriented toward
specific music needs, and that this is best taught through the Music Area.
Dr. Thomas Priest, the Director of Music Education who came on board this year
is considering options regarding courses which could be better taught through
music.
Mission
Statement / Student Learning Outcomes
/ Curriculum
Grid / Assessment Plan / Contact Person
|