Geosciences
Results of Assessment
2003-2004 (submitted 10/15/04)
Learning outcome goals 2A to 2F, 3A, and 3B were assessed during the
2003-2004 academic year. Assessment techniques included exit interviews, a
general test given to seniors, and analysis of a capstone field project. Results
were discussed in a faculty meeting on 9/22/04.
Test results and graduate perceptions expressed during exit interviews indicated
that graduates were overall well prepared in most knowledge areas, although
values were again slightly lower for area 2D (structural processes). Analysis of
the capstone project indicated students had good abilities for collecting
geologic data, analyzing and presenting data in map and written formats, and
synthesizing observations to interpret geologic history. Graduates had many
positive things to say about the program, and most have become successfully
employed in geotechnical jobs, Earth science teaching, and/or are going to
graduate school. Strengths of the program indicated by students included:
knowledgeable faculty willing to help students learn, well balanced curriculum,
field experiences in many courses, campus groundwater well field, and
undergraduate research opportunities. Weaknesses indicated by students included
desire for more field trips, access to better lab equipment, and adding more
life science courses to the Earth science teaching major. Students were
satisfied with advising from the department and most met with an advisor at
least once a year.
Based on results, we plan to continue promoting close faculty-student
interaction, providing positive field experiences, incorporating lab and
computer applications into classes, encouraging student internships and
undergraduate research, emphasizing writing and problem solving in classes, and
encouraging students to meet with advisors. We recently expanded coverage of
structural analysis in Geosci 4060 (Field Methods) and will continue advising
students interested in geotechnical applications to take Geosci 3060 (Structural
Geology). We plan to revise the Earth Science Teaching major to provide teachers
with more endorsement options, and revise the Geomatics Certificate to reflect
changes in computer science and related classes. We plan to purchase additional
computer and lab equipment next year, but funding remains difficult. Although we
would like to offer more field trips and upper division options, this is
difficult given current staffing levels.
The department also participated in a university survey on effectiveness of
general education involving sections of Geosci PS1030 (Earthquakes and
Volcanoes), Geosci PS1110 (Physical Geology), and Geosci PS1540 (Environmental
Geosciences). Although results are not yet available, in general, we plan to
continue emphasizing knowledge of fundamental principles, use of scientific
method, problem solving, and ability to make informed decisions.
Planned assessment activities for the upcoming 2004-2005 academic year include:
conducting exit interviews of graduating majors; administering a comprehensive
exam to students in Geosci 4060 (Field Methods); collecting data from selected
lab and writing exercises in Geosci 1220 (Historical Geology), Geosci 3550 (Sedimentology
and Stratigraphy) and Geosci 4060; and student surveys of general education
classes. We plan to discuss results, and then modify our curriculum and
assessment measures as needed.
Mission Statement /
Student Learning Outcomes
/ Curriculum Grid / Assessment
Plan / Contact Person
|
