Weber State University   

Geosciences

Results of Assessment

2002-2003 (submitted 08/27/03)

Learning outcome goals 2A to 2F, 3A, and 3B were assessed during the 2002-2003 academic year. Assessment techniques included exit interviews, a general test given to seniors, analysis of a capstone field project. Results were discussed in a faculty meeting on 5/22/03.

Test results and graduate perceptions expressed during exit interviews indicated that graduates were overall well prepared in most knowledge areas, although values were slightly lower for area 2D (structural processes). Analysis of the capstone project indicated students had very good abilities for collecting geologic data, analyzing and presenting data in map and written formats, and synthesizing observations to interpret geologic history. Graduates had many positive things to say about the program, and most have become successfully employed in geotechnical and geospatial jobs, and/or are going to graduate school. Strengths of the program indicated by students included: knowledgeable and helpful faculty, field experiences in many courses, small class sizes, student room, campus groundwater well field, and flexibility of program. Weaknesses indicated by students included desire for more field applications in some classes, access to better lab equipment, and increased offerings of some upper division classes. Students were overall satisfied with advising and most met with an advisor at least once a year.

Based on results, we plan to continue promoting close faculty-student interaction, providing positive field experiences, incorporating lab and computer applications into classes, encouraging student internships, emphasizing written and problem solving exercises in classes, and encouraging students to meet with advisors. We recently expanded coverage of structural analysis in Geosci 4060 (Field Methods) and will continue advising students interested in geotechnical applications to take Geosci 3060 (Structural Geology). We plan to explore modifications to Earth Science Teaching major to provide teachers with more endorsement options, and discuss potential revisions to the Geospatial Analysis program when our new faculty member arrives. We plan to purchase additional computer and lab equipment next year, but funding remains difficult. Although we would like to offer more field experiences and upper division options, this is difficult given current staffing levels.

The department also participated in an initial university survey on effectiveness of general education involving sections of Geosci PS1030 (Earthquakes and Volcanoes) and Geosci PS1540 (Environmental Geosciences). Overall, students thought these classes were effective (average scores between 5 and 6 out of 7) in such areas as: knowledge of fundamental principles, understanding terminology, use of scientific method, and making informed decisions.

Planned assessment activities for the upcoming 2003-2004 academic year include: conducting exit interviews of graduating majors; administering a comprehensive exam to students in Geosci 4060 (Field Methods); collecting data from selected lab and writing exercises in Geosci 1220 (Historical Geology), Geosci 3550 (Sedimentology and Stratigraphy) and Geosci 4060; and refining assessment of general education classes. We plan to discuss results, and then modify our curriculum and assessment measures as needed.

Mission Statement / Student Learning Outcomes / Curriculum Grid / Assessment Plan / Contact Person