Weber State University   

Geosciences

Results of Assessment

2001-2002 (submitted 09/06/02)

Learning outcome goals 2A to 2F, 3A, and 3B were assessed during the 2001-2002 academic year. Assessment techniques included exit interviews, a general test given to seniors, analysis of writing examples in lower and upper division classes, and analysis of a field project. Results were discussed in a faculty meeting on 9/5/02.

Test results and graduate perceptions expressed during exit interviews indicated that graduates were overall well prepared in most knowledge areas, although values were slightly lower for areas 2B (Earth history) and 2D (structural processes). Writing samples indicated students had fair to good abilities for clearly expressing Earth science concepts in introductory classes, and overall good abilities in upper division classes. Sample projects from the Field Camp course (Geosci 4510) indicated students could successfully collect geologic data, analyze and present data in map and other formats, and synthesize observations to interpret geologic history. Graduates had many positive things to say about the program, and most have become successfully employed in geotechnical and geospatial jobs, and/or are going to graduate school. Overall strengths indicated by graduates during exit interviews included: small class size, close student-faculty interaction, field applications in many courses, internships, and practical lab exercises. Many students wanted access to more lab equipment, and some desired additional field applications in introductory classes and greater flexibility in the Applied Environmental Geosciences major.

Based on results, we plan to continue promoting close faculty-student interaction, providing positive field experiences, incorporating lab and computer applications into classes, encouraging student internships, and emphasizing both written and problem solving exercises in classes. We also plan to continue encouraging students to receive advising early in their programs. Changes we will plan to implement include: expanding the coverage of structural analysis in Geosci 4060 (Field Methods) and advising students interested in geotechnical applications to take Geosci 3060 (Structural Geology); implementing curriculum changes to provide greater flexibility in the Applied Environmental Geosciences major; and modifying the curriculum for the Earth Science Teaching major to provide teachers with more endorsement options. We plan to purchase additional surveying and computer equipment this year funded from RSPG and ARCC grants, and seek additional funding for other equipment. Although we would like to offer more field experiences, this is difficult given current faculty resources and transportation policies.

Planned assessment activities for the upcoming 2002-2003 academic year include: conducting exit interviews of graduating majors; administering a modified comprehensive exam to students in Geosci 4060 (Field Methods); and collecting data from selected lab and writing exercises in Geosci 1220 (Historical Geology) and Geosci 4060. We plan to discuss results, and then modify our curriculum and assessment measures as needed.

Mission Statement / Student Learning Outcomes / Curriculum Grid / Assessment Plan / Contact Person