Weber State University
   

English As A Second Language

Results of Assessment

2002-2003 (submitted 01/20/04)

As a continuation of the ESL Program Assessment for the 2002-2003 year an intensive study on the ESL Student’s ability to read and comprehend English college textbooks to successfully pass general education courses was conducted by Debi Sheridan as her Master of Education’s thesis requirement, "Weber State University ESL Student Reading Comprehension." (2003)

ESL students face many challenges as they study in a foreign language. Problems range from culture shock and the resulting cognitive dissonance to an inability to grasp basic concepts in a new subject. The multitude of problems which await a foreign student can be minimized if their reading skills are honed to sufficiently prepare them to understand the new concepts they will encounter.

Helping students to read English at an academic level is one of the major goals in the English as a Second Language (ESL) Program at Weber State University (Weber State). The greatest obstacles the teachers address are the variations in learning styles dictated by pedagogical practices in students’ native lands, and/or the individual strategies each student has developed. Both national and individual styles will hamper or accelerate the rate at which the student comprehends and assimilates information in English. With this diversity, it is difficult to ensure individual comprehension within the guidelines set for each class. ESL students can quickly master the surface features of the language and seem more fluent than they really are, so although they may meet the requirements of specific Weber State ESL classes, they may still have limited comprehension in their academic classes.

The Weber State ESL program addresses the four language skills of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and in a very short time prepares the ESL student for entry into academic classes. Some students enter the Weber State ESL program with no knowledge of English, limited English proficiency, or high English proficiency. All students must complete level five, ESL 2510 academic writing class, a prerequisite for English 1010, or test out of the ESL program. However, students may enter the academic community when they commence level four, at which time they are eligible to take ESL classes concurrently with selected academic classes. It does not appear that the fourth level or even fifth level students have necessarily had sufficient exposure to the Graeco-Latin academic language required of students in academic classes. Neither have they had sufficient time in L2 study, nor acquire comprehensible input instruction, to adequately prepare them to be efficient independent readers capable of realizing their potential in academic classes. Although they have been taught reading strategies in Weber State ESL reading classes, they may need to review those strategies, and be provided with more support as they apply them specifically. The short time that the students have been in the program, often as little as two semesters, has not afforded them sufficient time to develop the breadth or depth of vocabulary to deal with the wide range of academic texts they will encounter.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this project was to find out whether supplementary reading instruction for students in the Weber State ESL program would aid them in comprehending the written texts assigned to their academic classes. In particular;

1. Would the level of comprehension improve after the students participate in a six-week study, which taught text strategies and content specific vocabulary?

2. Would note taking on texts be improved through the use of interactive notebooks?

3. Would the students transfer the skills they learned and achieve better grades across the curriculum in this semester than those in the control group?

4. Would the students feel more confident as readers and learners?

ASSESSMENT

An Informal Reading Inventory (IRI)about the physiology of the human body and features of the physical world the students were familiar with was used. The assessment took place at a time and place which suited the students, giving them some control over the process. As the assessment was not vital to their studies, there was no academic value placed on it and the students were happy and willing to participate.  The assessment took the form of

1. a pre- and post-IRI for each student. The pre and post test results form the basis of the t-test.

2. pre- and post-study text annotation

evidence gathered from the instructor review of notebooks.

4. anecdotal evidence gathered from random interviews of the treatment students before, during, and after the study of the students involved.

METHODOLOGY

Students

The population for the study was from a variety of cultural backgrounds:

  • Latin American: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia
  • Mexican
  • Japanese
  • Thai
  • South Korean
  • Palestinian
  • Saudi Arabian

All the students were currently enrolled in ESL 2510 Level IV academic writing. The students were then divided into a control group and a treatment group.

Procedure

All the students took an Informal Reading Inventory (IRI) and met for six weeks. The ESL students learned how to:

  • Pre-view texts.
  • Annotate texts and write questions and observations in a notebook as they studied.
  • Better understand vocabulary through vocabulary instruction on a weekly basis.
  • At the conclusion of the six weeks the students took a post IRI

Previewing

Although pre-viewing skills were taught at specific times, they were reviewed during each lesson. The students were interviewed to ascertain what skills they were using, and when the skills were used.

Notebooks

The students were taught to annotate. The students were given a notebook to carry with them at all times. Then, when an "A-ha" or problem with language occurred the student was to record it in the notebook. Time was allocated at the beginning of each lesson to specific problems students identified.

Vocabulary

One discrete skill the students were taught was how to use the glossary. The main purpose was for students to identify which meaning is being used in the context of the content area and identify content specific phrases. They were taught skills so they could rely on context clues in order to become more independent and thus grow in self confidence.

FINDINGS

  • The words per minute (wpm) each student read largely improved over the six weeks for the control group. However, the treatment group students’ t-test wpm scores were less in the post-test than in the pre-test. The main reason seems to be the different approach the students took; after previewing the text, they then took a pencil and annotate the test in some way as they read through, which added a number of seconds to the time taken.
  • There was a significantly larger increase in comprehension among the treatment group.
  • The notebooks were useful mostly as a reminder. By the end of the study, notebook use was an established habit.
  • Previewing strategies were very successful. Even though the students recognized pre-viewing would take extra time and were afraid to use it in certain testing situations where there were time restrictions, most of the treatment group employed the strategy successfully.
  • Recognizing types of questions proved extremely useful to the treatment group.
  • Vocabulary strategies also showed the students that there is help within reach if they just understand where to look for it in the text.
  • Confidence grew as the students realized they did not have to depend on a dictionary every time they met a new word.
  • They were excited with their learning as they taught each other, which worked as a great motivator and a way to reinforce the students’ understanding of their own learning.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is apparent from the study that most ESL students do need extra reading support. Although they have been taught all of these strategies in the Weber State ESL program the students need to re-view the strategies once they have an academic subject to which to apply them. Small academic support groups led by a skilled tutor is of extreme importance. Small groups seem to be more effective than large ones, where the students can get lost or hide, or individual tutoring where the atmosphere can be sterile. Group support is important in reassuring the students they do not struggle alone, and they are not stupid because they find English hard to understand. Encouragement and empathy from others in a similar situation should not be underestimated.

One big problem, which was reinforced in the initial interview, is that very often international ESL students’ self-perception is negatively affected by the change of culture and language. Working in small groups of multi-cultural students allows the students to build a support network of peers who struggle with the same issues, but succeed in differing areas and can thereby encourage each other.

It is also recommended that for the academic success of ESL students that reading support classes or groups be organized for ESL students enrolled in academic classes. The class/groups(s) should be no more than six in number and be organized on the basis of pairing with an academic course of study.

It would also be of great benefit if ESL students were advised to take academic classes in groups so Supplemental Instructors or tutors can be assigned to those classes and maximize the aid the students are given.

TEACHING STRATEGIES

With the vast cultural variety of knowledge and learning in an ESL classroom, constant revision is required for students to retain the knowledge and concepts being taught to comprehend a text. Many ESL readers struggle with the complex language structures of an English text and are prevented from accessing the information contained therein. ESL teachers need to activate all language clues related to the text.

To bring some uniformity of understanding to the students in a particular class sensitive foundational instruction is required. A uniformity of understanding is required if students are to learn what is being taught. The foundations for each student must be clear and correct if, as they build new concepts on old and broaden their understanding of certain precepts, they are to learn the ‘Truths’ being taught.

Reading and Writing

Reading and writing are very closely related and for students to excel, and achieve greater comprehension of what they read, reading should be supported by meaningful writing activities. It is of ultimate importance that all assignments are authentic, that they have intrinsic value, and never busy work, and offer the student opportunities to develop as readers and writers. As they make their own connections with a text, the writing opportunities they are given should help them to explore their understanding, reactions and feelings towards it, and view their reading as ‘a work in progress’. Writing activities offer the opportunity for a student to re-see a text, to work out the meaning, and establish their own insights which may have been hampered at the time of the initial reading.

Talking About Texts

Students need to be able to "not just talk about things in general, but ‘talk about text’...[they need]...a kind of discourse where learners talk repeatedly about knowledge gained from texts. For ESL students, listening to the language as they both follow and talk about the [text]...is an important way to make connections between oral and written texts, to try out recently acquired vocabulary, and discover new ways of deploying communicative strategies" Ernest & Richard (1995).

Pairing

The research of Halpern, Patkowski, and Brooks (1996) is congruent with Laufer and Paribakht’s (1998), they showed that achieving a grade-level norm in L2 can take from four to eight years, and that L2 acquisition is more successful when it has a specific focus. It is advantageous in a university setting therefore, that acquisition be academically based rather than a purely linguistically based study. If students, having learned new vocabulary, especially academic vocabulary, have no opportunities to employ those words in motivated ways then the learning and retention of those words is at best a "hit-and-miss affair"(p.688). Consequently, it is more advantageous for ESL students to be offered ESL and Content classes simultaneously. Pairing an ESL reading class with an academic class can improve the student’s reading ability and comprehension. This pairing should use the academic text for the ESL class, thus providing the students extra teaching time and personal interaction with the text.

Vocabulary

ESL dictionary use should be taught as a skill by an ESL teacher, and embedded in a variety and diversity of reading assignments for the potential of dictionary use to be fully realized. Zimmerman’s study (1997) of ESL readers employed interactive vocabulary instruction and self-selected reading. Results showed the participants felt that it is insufficient to rely on:

1. the benefits of a bi-lingual dictionary as there seems to be no marked increase in reading comprehension. ESL students need to know more about target words than the explanation in a dictionary, bi-lingual or monolingual.

2. memorization of lists of words in isolation was of little benefit. It is difficult to learn the

complexities of target words without meaningful and relevant contexts.

3. studies of word roots and affixes. Where L1 is not a Romance language the construction of words and complexity of use is radically different.

4. drills and rote activities, because many vocabulary teaching methods are at best boring, and at worst painful.

5. reading a good book. While it may be an enjoyable experience for the competent reader, it can be a painfully slow and laborious job for the less able.

Previewing

Chen and Graves (1998) suggested that the strategy of pre-viewing was "very effective" in "guiding [ESL] students towards successful reading experiences" (p.571). Previews are substantial introductions and overview of the assigned reading, substantial enough that the student has a good idea of the content they are about to read. Previews, therefore, provide solid foundations for the students to build their understanding on. It is also an effectual means of directing the students’ attention to the most important information in the text and also uses clear and specific instruction.

SUMMARY

It is obvious from the research available that it is not sufficient merely to teach ESL students to decode the alphabetic units on the page. Even though they are adults able to read in their own language, as with all developing readers, ESL students need a copious amount of support to continue to refine and hone their reading skills. If they are not able to extract the relevant information and assimilate it in a way which will aid their study, then their lack of comprehension will hinder their efforts and eventually defeat them.

RESOURCE

Detailed information and exact statistics used in the study are available through the ESL Office, SS380, 626-6028, or the bound text, "Weber State University ESL Student Reading Comprehension, Debi Sheridan, 2003, may be viewed in the Stewart Library.

Mission Statement / Student Learning Outcomes / Curriculum Grid / Assessment Plan / Contact Person 

Students | Prospective Students | Alumni | Faculty & Staff | Community | General Information

Comments or questions about this area of our site? Give us your feedback.
Weber State University - Office of Academic Affairs, Ogden, Utah 84408, (801) 626-6000  
Copyright © 1999 All Rights Reserved.

Weber State University