
Weber State University
Results of Assessment
2007-2008 (submitted 01/16/09)
The School of Accountancy seeks to continuously improve by assessing student, faculty, and program-related outcomes. The following information is provided to describe the efforts over the past year by faculty and staff to assess the effectiveness of the program’s mission and goals and to measure learning outcomes.Student Learning Outcomes
Graduates from the School of Accountancy will:
1 AACSB Accounting Accreditation Standards
Assessment Results – Direct Assessment
| Learning Outcomes | Traits | Term | Course | Percent of students achieving the outcome | |||
| Under 50% | 51-79% | 80-95% | Over 95% | ||||
| 1c. Business processes, analysis, and decision making | Accounting Processes | Fall 06 | 3750 | 3% | 0% | 40% | 57% |
| Spring 07 | 3750 | 5% | 0% | 11% | 84% | ||
| Fall 07 | 3750 | 10% | 6% | 16% | 68% | ||
| 1d. Internal Controls and security | Accounting Controls | Fall 06 | 3750 | 0% | 14% | 66% | 21% |
| Fall 07 | 3750 | 0% | 4% | 81% | 15% | ||
| 1e. Risk Assessment and assurance for financial and non-financial reporting |
Audit & Control Risk |
Fall 06 | 4510 | 3% | 60% | 37% | 0% |
| Fall 07 | 4510 | 14% | 68% | 18% | 0% | ||
| 1f. Recording, analysis, and interpretation of accounting data for decision making. | Recording in the accounting cycle | Spring 06 | 3110 | 0% | 38% | 50% | 12% |
| Fall 06 | 3110 | 0% | 4% | 71% | 25% | ||
| Spring 07 | 3110 | 0% | 15% | 69% | 15% | ||
| Fall 07 | 3110 | 0% | 5% | 73% | 23% | ||
| Fall 07 | 6120 | 0% | 11% | 70% | 19% | ||
| 1h. Application of technology to financial and non-financial information management. | Database | Fall 07 | 3750 | 13% | 0% | 27% | 60% |
| Accounting solutions | Fall 07 | 3750 | 0% | 7% | 0% | 93% | |
| Accounting solutions | Fall 07 | 6610 | 0% | 7% | 67% | 23% | |
| ACL | Fall 07 | 6610 | 0% | 0% | 7% | 93% | |
| Word Processing | Fall 07 | 3120 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Word Processing | Fall 07 | 6560 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Spreadsheets | Fall 07 | 5130 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Presentations | Fall 07 | 6610 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| 1i. Tax law and compliance for individuals and enterprises. | Law & forms | Fall 07 | 5440 | 0% | 13% | 70% | 17% |
| Fall 07 | 6430 | 8% | 38% | 35% | 19% | ||
| 3. Use library, Internet, and research databases as resources to gather information. | Use accounting research database | Fall 06 | 3120 | 8% | 32% | 47% | 13% |
| Fall 07 | 3120 | 10% | 29% | 42% | 19% | ||
| Fall 07 | 6120 | 0% | 7% | 70% | 22% | ||
| Fall 07 | 6400 | 0% | 0% | 72% | 28% | ||
As a result of the discussion among faculty, it was determined to continue to refine our outcomes and our data collection methods. More data is needed before beginning to make significant adjustments to our curriculum and delivery. However, it is clear that small, incremental changes are taking place in how faculty approach assessment and how outcomes are taught.
Major Field Test Results
| 2005* | 2006** | |||||
| Mean (of 200) | Count | Mean | Percentile | Count | ||
| Percentile on all questions | ||||||
| WSU | 165.0 | 37 | 166.0 | 95th | 21 | |
| All Students | 157.2 | 4862 | 153.1 | 50th | 8986 | |
| All Institutions | 156.7 | 10 | 152.5 | 45th | 181 | |
| Percent Correct on Accounting Questions | ||||||
| WSU | 55% | 63.0% | 95th | |||
| All Institutions | 48.7% | 50.7% | 50th | |||
|
* Comparative Data is from a report for all students at 10 institutions from 2002-2005. ** Comparative Data is from a report for all students at 564 institutions from 8/2006-6/2008. |
||||||
Weber State students majoring in business have scored above their peers at other institutions for the past two years. All GSBE majors are required to complete Accounting 2010 and 2020 as part of their degree preparation. These courses in financial and managerial accounting appear to be providing students with an understanding of accounting concepts such that they score well above their peers at other institutions taking the major field test during the same period.
Assessment Results and Implications – Indirect Assessment
Advisory Council: To ensure that the program’s outcomes are appropriate and meaningful, an active advisory council of accounting community professionals met twice last year, in October and April. Key agenda items were the School of Accountancy’s assurance of learning efforts and accreditation status and the creation of a Master of Taxation degree.
Recruiting Participation: The following table depicts the number of organizations that participated in the recruiting process for accounting graduates.
| Year | Organizations attending the Meet-the-Firms Night | Organizations attending Meet-the-Firms Golf Outing | Recruiters Seeking Accounting Students |
| 2004-5 | 29 | 14 | 75 |
| 2005-6 | 28 | 20 | 79 |
| 2006-7 | 29 | 27 | 97 |
| 2007-8 | 28 | 24 (firms sent more than one team) | 77 (100 positions) |
Placement: The following tables illustrate how students were placed in key segments of the accounting profession based on exit survey responses.
Undergraduate Students
Career Segment Total Percent Government 6 13.6% Public Accounting - National 1 2.3% Public Accounting - Regional/Local 8 18.2% Industry 24 54.5% Stay-at-home mom 1 2.3% Unreported 4 9.1% Total 44 100.0% Graduate School (may also be working in one of the segments above) 40 Graduate Students
Career Segment Total Percent Tax Track Professional Track Government 4 15.4% 1 3 Public Accounting - National 0 0% 0 0 Public Accounting - Regional/Local 9 34.6% 3 6 Industry 11 42.3% 5 6 Unreported 2 7.7% 2 0 Total 26 100.0% 11 15
Exit Surveys: To understand the current state of performance related to the program’s outcomes and to gain insight into the experience of graduates at Weber State, exit surveys are completed each year by the School of Accountancy’s graduates. Each year, the surveys yield meaningful information pertaining to student opinion. The results of these questions are shown below (on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being equivalent to “strongly agree” and 5 being “strongly disagree”). In 2008, several modifications were made to the survey instrument. Several questions were changed, added, or deleted and the survey was delivered electronically using Survey Monkey.
2007-08 Results – Overall Satisfaction: The 2008 exit survey found that students continue to agree that their experience in the program was pleasant and rewarding and one that they would recommend.
Undergraduate Students
Exit Survey Question Baseline: 2001 2005 2006 2007 2008 My overall experience in the undergraduate program in the School of Accountancy was very pleasant. 1.975 1.76 1.69 1.64 1.89 My overall experience in the undergraduate program in the School of Accountancy was rewarding. 1.76 I would recommend the undergraduate accounting program to my friends. 1.875 1.55 1.58 1.59 1.71 The WSU undergraduate accountancy program prepared me for my career. 1.87 Graduate Students
Exit Survey Question 2006 2007 2008 My overall experience in the MAcc program was very pleasant. 1.66 1.53 My overall experience in the MAcc program was rewarding. 1.27 I would recommend the MAcc program to my friends. 1.59 1.44 1.27 If I were in charge of hiring Master's graduates at the firm I work for, I would definitely recruit WSU graduates. 1.2
2007-08 Results - Student Outcomes: To add detail to the overall satisfaction students experience in the program, the exit survey collects responses to many additional questions that can be grouped into categories, including the program's student learning outcomes.
|
Outcome/Year |
Exit Survey Scores | |||||||
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |
| Knowledge Acquisition: | 1.900 | 1.885 | 1.710 | 1.735 | 1.89 | 1.82 | 1.95 | 2.06 |
| Critical Thinking Skills: | 1.625 | 1.485 | 1.835 | 1.780 | 1.80 | 1.68 | 1.56 | 1.66 |
| Information Skills: | 1.864 | 1.796 | 1.817 | 1.854 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.80 | |
| Professional Values: | 2.000 | 1.500 | 1.710 | 2.050 | 2.00 | 1.85 | 1.75 | 1.55 |
| Communication Skills: | 1.913 | 1.970 | 2.130 | 2.105 | 2.54 | 2.16 | 2.08 | 1.94 |
| Contextual Awareness: | 2.162 | 2.187 | 2.213 | 2.204 | 2.18 | 2.10 | 2.01 | 2.30 |
| Interpersonal Skills: | 1.925 | 1.730 | 2.080 | 2.210 | 2.24 | 2.19 | 2.00 | |
| Business Processes: | 1.81 | |||||||
| Internal Controls | 1.92 | |||||||
| Risk Assessment: | 2.02 | |||||||
| Recording, Analysis, & Interpretation: | 1.95 | |||||||
| Project Management: | 2.30 | |||||||
| Technology: | 2.28 | |||||||
| Taxation: | 1.64 | |||||||
| Research: | 1.88 | |||||||
The table illustrates that the students agree that the student outcomes are being met, however, differences among the variables suggest that program improvement, as always is needed. The program will continue to assess these variables and adapt to counter unfavorable trends. It is important that direct measures be implemented to assess what students know to validate what they think they know. With new learning outcomes in place, the exit surveys will continue to measure students' perception of how well they achieved them.
Graduate Students
Outcome/Year
(Sorted by 2007 scores)Exit Survey Scores 2006 2007 2008 Critical Thinking Skills: 1.66 1.69 1.43 Information Skills: 1.71 1.69 1.43 Communication Skills: 1.67 1.75 1.57 Professional Values: 1.79 1.88 1.60 Knowledge Acquisition: 1.73 1.91 1.10 Interpersonal Skills: 1.97 1.93 1.87 Contextual Awareness: 2.32 2.27 1.81
2007-08 Results – Faculty and Program Support Resources: For the purpose of improvement, the faculty, course administration, and support resources of the program are assessed by students in the exit survey. Students are asked about the faculty’s availability, classroom environment, biases, respect for students and the administration of the course. The program support staff and resources are rated in terms of availability, helpfulness, and the ability to answer questions. Faculty and program support resources were given the following favorable ratings over the past several years:
Undergraduate Students
Outcome/Year
Exit Survey Scores 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Faculty 2.024 1.858 1.867 1.849 1.83 1.75 1.76 1.92 Course Administration 2.04 1.69 1.8 1.8 1.92 1.80 1.85 2.05 Program Support Resources 2.085 1.725 2.034 1.940 1.89 1.86 1.86 Graduate Students
Outcome/Year 2006 2007 2008 Faculty 1.79 1.83 1.50 Course Administration 2.08 1.97 Program Support Resources 1.81 1.68 1.40
2007-08 Results - Career Services: Graduates in Accounting have reflected some neutrality toward career services on their survey scores.
Undergraduate Students
Outcome/Year
Exit Survey Score 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Career Services 2.798 2.583 2.17 2.557 2.59 2.88 2.81 2.20 WSU Career Services 2.21 GSBE Career Services 2.20 Graduate Students
Outcome/Year
Exit Survey Score 2005 2006 2007 2008 Career Services 3.16 2.61 2.42 2.42 WSU Career Services 2.71 GSBE Career Services 2.40
As are result of persistent comments from students and relatively negative scores on exit surveys regarding Career Services, the faculty began to focus on ways to improve the service provided to our students.
First, the Dean's office made an organizational change to bring the Career Services liaison within the Goddard School. The coordinator now reports directly to the Dean.
Second, various discussions have been conducted with the coordinator to determine process gaps in what students need and what the career services function tries to provide. Several gaps were identified and process changes were implemented to attempt to improve students' perception of the service. It was also determined that faculty can play a greater role in communicating the process to students.
Mission Statement / Student Learning Outcomes / Curriculum Grid / Assessment Plan / Contact Person
|
Students | Prospective Students | Alumni | Faculty & Staff | Community | General Information |
|
|
Comments or
questions about this area of our site? Give us your
feedback. |
|